Adaptive Evacuation #A-01
Real-time corridor evaluation across distance, plume exposure, worker density, and physical gate accessibility.
Route A (North-West Upwind Corridor) is Currently Recommended
The 44.2% LEL vapor plume is confined to the East Central Manifold, blocking Route C (86/100). Route A maintains the lowest composite risk score (23/100).
Dynamic Field Evacuation Signage
Telemetry preview of battery-backed field signage units across depot junctions.
Proceed to Assembly Point Alpha (West Upwind)
Exits Gantry Bay A via West Service Road and Emergency Gate EX-W1 to Upwind Muster Alpha. (245 m · est. 140s).
Active Evacuation Recommendation
Recommended based on current simulated conditions: lowest composite risk score (23/100, threshold 65) with 245 m travel distance, 8/100 hazard exposure, and verified accessibility.
Candidate Evacuation Corridors
Limit ≤ 65/100Route A: North-West Upwind Corridor
Recommended based on current simulated conditions: lowest composite risk score (23/100, threshold 65) with 245 m travel distance, 8/100 hazard exposure, and verified accessibility.
Route B: South Perimeter Bypass
Eligible alternative route (risk score 28/100 <= threshold 65). Higher composite cost than the recommended corridor due to distance (340 m) or crowd density (28/100).
Route C: Central Manifold East Shortcut
Route blocked: risk score (86/100) exceeds configured threshold (65/100) because corridor intersects Hydrocarbon Vapor Plume (Central Manifold) and Downwind Smoke Dispersion Plume.
Factor Breakdown · Route A: North-West Upwind Corridor
23 pts- Distance Factor
- +15 pts (245 m)
- Plume Exposure
- +4 pts (Idx 8)
- Worker Density
- +4 pts (Idx 24)
- Access Penalty
- +0 pts (Open)
Score = w_dist·D + w_exp·E + w_den·C + w_acc·A